![]() If you got your MP3s from and it was poorly ripped from a CD in 1998 and transferred through Napster 20 times, you'll definitely notice the difference. ![]() The difference between MP3 320 and MP3 128 to me, is non-existent. My 64GB MP3 128 collection in FLAC would probably use something along the lines of 1-1.5TB of useful storage! For me, there is no discernible difference between the quality of the two and the space savings are immense. Very rarely I could notice a very tiny difference in quality, which if I wasn't listening to straight after each other, I would never notice.Ĭan someone explain to my WHY so many people HAVE to get all their music in FLAC format and won't use MP3 320 or 128? I seriously cannot understand why. I then converted it to MP3 128 and listened to both versions. One day, however, I was curious on just what the difference in quality was, so I downloaded a song in FLAC that was highly regarded in comments as true FLAC quality, blah blah blah. To save space, I always convert it down to MP3 128 so that I can store my music on my phone. ![]() I have downloaded music in FLAC and in MP3. I have an A/V receiver through HDMI for my sound and I have decent speakers connected to it. I don't want to start a war between audiophiles and non-audiophiles or a war on which
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |